Insurance companies in Washington State have a legal obligation known as the duty of good faith and fair dealing. This duty, implied in every insurance contract, requires them to act honestly, fairly, and promptly when handling a policyholder’s claim. They must thoroughly investigate claims, provide a reasonable basis for any denials, and offer a fair settlement in a timely manner. When an insurer breaches this duty, it acts in “bad faith.” Navigating a bad faith insurance claim is a complex legal battlefield where policyholders are at a significant disadvantage. The role of a lawyer in these disputes is not merely beneficial; it is often essential to level the playing field, protect the policyholder’s rights, and secure the full compensation owed under the law.
Understanding Washington’s Bad Faith Insurance Laws
Washington has established a robust legal framework to protect consumers from unscrupulous insurance practices, primarily through the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (IFCA) and the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). A lawyer’s first crucial role is to determine which laws apply and build a case under the appropriate statutes.
-
Common Law Bad Faith: Under Washington common law, an insurer commits bad faith by acting unreasonably in its investigation, evaluation, or settlement of a claim. This can be a denial, delay, or undervaluing of a claim without a reasonable basis. Proving common law bad faith requires showing the insurer’s conduct was unreasonable and that it knew or should have known it was unreasonable.
-
The Insurance Fair Conduct Act (IFCA): Enacted in 2007, IFCA provides policyholders with a powerful statutory remedy. It creates a cause of action for an insurer’s “unreasonable denial of a claim for coverage or payment of benefits.” IFCA has several key advantages for policyholders. If a court finds a violation, the insurer may be liable for the actual damages, plus triple the damages (treble damages), along with attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. A lawyer will meticulously analyze whether the insurer’s actions trigger IFCA’s provisions.
-
The Consumer Protection Act (CPA): Insurance bad faith can also constitute an unfair or deceptive act under the CPA. To succeed, a lawyer must prove the act was unfair/deceptive, occurred in trade or commerce, impacted the public interest, and caused injury to the plaintiff. A successful CPA claim can result in actual damages, treble damages (up to $25,000), and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs.
A skilled lawyer understands the nuances of each avenue and often pleads them in the alternative to maximize the client’s potential recovery and apply maximum pressure on the insurance company to settle fairly.
Identifying and Investigating Bad Faith Conduct
Insurance companies are sophisticated entities, and their bad faith is rarely overt. It is often buried in delayed communications, overly burdensome requests, or complex policy interpretations. A lawyer acts as an investigator and strategist to uncover these tactics.
Common examples of bad faith a lawyer will look for include:
- Unreasonable Delay: Failing to acknowledge, investigate, or respond to a claim within a reasonable timeframe without justification.
- Inadequate Investigation: Refusing to consider evidence that supports the claim, failing to hire appropriate experts, or conducting a biased, superficial investigation designed to find reasons for denial.
- Lowball Offers: Offering a settlement amount significantly lower than what a reasonable evaluation of the claim would support.
- Misrepresenting Policy Language: Denying coverage by misinterpreting or misstating the terms of the insurance policy.
- Failure to Defend: In liability insurance cases, refusing to provide a legal defense for the policyholder when a claim is potentially covered.
- Ignoring Medical Evidence: Dismissing or downplaying medical reports and doctor recommendations without a valid basis.
The lawyer will obtain the entire claim file from the insurer, a right afforded to Washington policyholders. This file contains internal notes, emails, and reports that often reveal the true motive behind a denial—showing a focus on minimizing payout rather than a fair evaluation.
The Strategic Value of Legal Counsel in Negotiations
Before filing a lawsuit, a lawyer engages in strategic negotiations with the insurance company and its legal team. This phase is critical. An experienced bad faith lawyer understands that the goal is not just to get the original claim paid but to seek compensation for the entire harm caused by the bad faith.
- Demand Packages: A lawyer drafts a powerful demand package that outlines the factual basis for the underlying claim, details the insurer’s bad faith actions, cites relevant Washington law (IFCA, CPA), and presents a comprehensive damages calculation. This package signals to the insurer that the policyholder is serious, informed, and prepared to litigate.
- Calculating Full Damages: The recoverable damages in a bad faith case extend far beyond the original policy benefits. A lawyer will seek:
- Contract Damages: The unpaid benefits owed under the policy.
- Consequential Damages: All foreseeable losses caused by the bad faith. For example, if a denied property claim led to a business going bankrupt, those business losses are recoverable. If a health claim was denied and a patient’s condition worsened, the resulting medical costs are recoverable.
- Emotional Distress: Washington courts recognize that the stress and anxiety of being wrongfully denied insurance benefits can be a compensable harm.
- Statutory Penalties: Pursuing treble damages under IFCA and the CPA.
- Attorneys’ Fees and Costs: Ensuring the insurer is responsible for the cost of having to hire a lawyer to obtain what was rightfully owed.
An unrepresented individual might accept an offer for the original claim value, unknowingly forfeiting their right to these significant additional damages. A lawyer ensures every component of loss is quantified and demanded.
Litigating a Bad Faith Insurance Claim
When negotiations fail to yield a just result, litigation becomes necessary. This is where a lawyer’s expertise is irreplaceable. Bad faith litigation is highly specialized, requiring a deep understanding of insurance law, civil procedure, and evidence rules.
- Pleading the Case: The lawyer drafts a complaint that precisely lays out causes of action for breach of contract, common law bad faith, and violations of IFCA and the CPA. This sets the stage for the entire case and frames the issues for the judge and jury.
- Discovery: This is the evidence-gathering phase. A lawyer uses tools like interrogatories (written questions), requests for production of documents (to get the insurer’s full claim file and internal manuals), and depositions (sworn testimony) of the insurance adjusters, managers, and corporate representatives. The goal is to expose the internal policies and decision-making processes that led to the bad faith.
- Expert Witnesses: Lawyers often retain expert witnesses to testify that the insurer’s actions fell below the accepted standards of the insurance industry. These experts are crucial in explaining to a jury why the company’s conduct was unreasonable.
- Motions Practice: Insurance companies often file motions for summary judgment, asking the court to dismiss the case before trial. A lawyer must craft compelling legal arguments to defeat these motions and keep the case alive for a jury to decide.
- Trial: If a settlement is not reached, the lawyer presents the case to a jury. This involves telling a compelling story, presenting complex evidence clearly, cross-examining the insurer’s witnesses, and arguing for a verdict that not only covers all damages but also punishes the insurer for its misconduct.
The Unique Challenges of First-Party vs. Third-Party Bad Faith
A lawyer must also navigate the distinction between first-party and third-party claims, as the strategies differ.
- First-Party Bad Faith: This involves a dispute between the policyholder and their own insurer over a claim made for their own loss (e.g., homeowner’s, health, disability, or uninsured motorist coverage). The lawyer’s focus is on the insurer’ failure to pay benefits owed directly to the client.
- Third-Party Bad Faith: This arises from a liability insurance policy (e.g., auto, homeowners). Here, a third party sues the policyholder, and the insurer has a duty to defend and settle the claim within policy limits. Bad faith occurs if the insurer refuses a reasonable settlement offer, exposing the policyholder to a personal judgment exceeding their policy limits. In these cases, the lawyer sues the insurer to recover the full excess judgment levied against the client.
In both scenarios, the Washington bad faith insurance lawyer serves as a dedicated advocate, leveraging their knowledge of state-specific laws and procedures to hold powerful insurance companies accountable for failing to honor their contractual and legal promises to policyholders.
